PDA

View Full Version : Bill Gates To Frisk MS Users


forwardone
07-26-05, 02:44 PM
The next time you visit the website of Microsoft Corp. to download some software, be prepared to let the world's biggest software company have a look inside your computer.

In a determined strike to quell the proliferation of counterfeit software, beginning today, Microsoft will require that all customers coming to its website for upgrades and other downloads submit their computers to an electronic frisking.

If you use one of the estimated hundred million PCs running pirated software, don't expect your upgrade. For Microsoft, the new policy is a stepped-up effort to combat the loss of billions of dollars worth of software sales every year to counterfeiters around the world. But in ramping up efforts to fight piracy, the Redmond, Wash.-based behemoth already finds itself fending off critics over privacy.

"It sets an extremely negative precedent," Pam Dixon, executive director of World Privacy Forum, a non-profit public-interest research centre in San Diego, said of the company's initiative. "Microsoft is saying, 'Before I let you do anything at all, you have to open your computer to us.' I really object to this."

The company will scan machines for a variety of information, including product keys or software authorization codes, operating-system version and details on the flow of data between the operating system and other hardware, such as printers.

It is access to this information that particularly upsets the privacy advocates. Ms. Dixon says the only information Microsoft needs to fight piracy is the product key and the operating-system version, and she says that Microsoft will be able to identify users uniquely based on some of the information the company collects.

"They are grabbing more information than they need to deter piracy," she said.

If Microsoft deems a PC to be carrying contraband code, it won't allow a user to download Microsoft programs, with the exception of security patches. But the software company — which says that more than one in five U.S. computers runs a counterfeit version of its Windows product — is not just waving a stick. It is also offering a big carrot.

Microsoft said it will give a free copy of its Windows XP to customers who unknowingly bought a counterfeit version of the operating system and who fill out a piracy report, provide proof of purchase and send Microsoft the counterfeit CDs.

Customers who cannot provide proof of purchase but file a piracy report will receive a substantial discount on a legitimate version of the operating system, said Tim Prime, a product manager in the Windows client group at Microsoft Canada Co., a subsidiary of the U.S. company.

Executives at Microsoft reject any suggestions that the move will antagonize customers with privacy concerns.

"Customers want to know whether retailers have sold them genuine software," Mr. Prime said.

More than 40 million users agreed to have their systems scanned in a 10-month trial that began last September in several countries. The participation rate amounted to 58 per cent of all visitors to the pilot website, far exceeding Microsoft's expectations of just 10 per cent, Mr. Prime said.

Microsoft said no personal data will be collected during the validation process, and information will remain completely anonymous. The company said it commissioned TÜV-ITÖ, an independent German security auditor, to test how well its Windows Genuine Advantage program protects customers' data, and the firm concluded that Microsoft does not collect any personal information that would allow it to identify or contact a user.

Seth Schoen, a staff technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a civil liberties group in San Francisco specializing in technology issues, agreed that Microsoft would not be able to identify customers personally through the program. But the data collected are unique to every customer, just as human fingerprints are unique, and the issue becomes how long the company holds onto the details and whether they could become personally identifying later on, he said.

Technology companies have walked a fine line for years on the issue of collecting information from consumers' computers. Six years ago, RealNetworks Inc., whose software plays audio and video content on the Internet, released a patch for its RealJukebox program after the public learned the software was relaying personal information about users to the company.

More recently, Google Inc. created a privacy backlash when it said its free e-mail service, Gmail, would include special software that inserts ads into personal e-mails based on their content.

Clearly, Microsoft believes any risk of public-privacy concerns are worth incurring to fight a problem that has turned into an epidemic in some parts of the world.

Microsoft has been fighting counterfeit efforts for years with limited success. It says that 35 per cent of the world's computers run counterfeit software and that piracy cost the global software industry $41-billion in 2004.

The Canadian Alliance Against Software Theft and the Business Software Alliance reported recently that 36 per cent of all software applications in use in Canada are pirated, costing $1.1-billion in lost retail software sales.

Geoff

betrdanevr
07-27-05, 05:30 AM
Interesting indeed, Geoff.

And it really does boggle the mind when you think about how many people in the world use Windows, and how there are essentially are no major competitors, and how that's been allowed to happen in this world of deregulation -- at least in the U.S.

Not being familiar with British economic policies, for example, are your airlines and utility companies deregulated, Geoff??


At least Sun Java "made it."

forwardone
07-27-05, 09:47 AM
Not being familiar with British economic policies, for example, are your airlines and utility companies deregulated, Geoff??


Yes, at one time the national airline was regulated, as was the Coal Board, all utilities from water to telephones, but all these have been deregulated over the years.

Competition has meant lower prices and to a great extent better quality of service too. Instead of answering to the government it now means the old and many of the new companies which have sprung up now answer to shareholders.

Geoff

betrdanevr
07-29-05, 04:41 AM
Yes, at one time the national airline was regulated, as was the Coal Board, all utilities from water to telephones, but all these have been deregulated over the years.

Competition has meant lower prices and to a great extent better quality of service too. Instead of answering to the government it now means the old and many of the new companies which have sprung up now answer to shareholders.

Geoff
I'm surprising even myself when I say this, but I'm not so certain deregulation has turned out to be all it's cracked up to be.

Maintenance of our aircraft is not what it used to be.

I've been with at least two local service telephone companies who have gone belly-up. And just TRY getting a comprehensive telephone book like we used to get!

Answering to shareholders ain't what it used to be, I fear. That's my biggest gripe about the healthcare industry. That, and retirement living providers. They're bought and sold at will. And you know why people do that? Pursuit of the almighty dollar, of course, and there are SOME areas of life, such as healthcare, that that shouldn't be allowed, IMNSHO. :(

forwardone
07-29-05, 11:01 AM
Answering to shareholders ain't what it used to be, I fear. That's my biggest gripe about the healthcare industry. That, and retirement living providers. They're bought and sold at will. And you know why people do that? Pursuit of the almighty dollar, of course, and there are SOME areas of life, such as healthcare, that that shouldn't be allowed, IMNSHO. :(
We`ve still got the National Health Service here, Terri, which is acknowledged as being excellent in the case of emergency treatments, operations following an accident, cancer treatments, that type of thing.

The problems arise when it`s a case of something like hip replacements or other types of elective surgery. Sometimes patients might have to wait, sometimes in considerable pain, for up to 12 months to receive the surgery, that`s after going to the G.P. then consultant etc.

Some people bypass the system and go private, either by paying for it themselves, or because they have health insurance. That can then cut the waiting times down to a matter of weeks, not many months.

So, at the end of the day, money still `talks.`

Geoff